☕ Cover: Pride, New York, USA
Good Morning. Here’s what you need to know to start the day, along with perspective from both sides for calmer coffee conversations with your family, friends, colleagues, and co-workers. Plus, a bit of good news: After 75 days of battling COVID-19, one Pennsylvania man celebrated a ‘miracle’ recovery.
📰 TOP STORY
On Monday the Supreme Court ruled that workers cannot be fired for being gay or transgender in a blockbuster win for members of the LGBTQ community. While employees in about half the country were already protected by local laws prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity, there was no federal law explicitly barring LGBTQ workers from being fired on that basis. The 6-3 holding, authored by Justice Neil Gorsuch, a conservative appointed by President Donald Trump, is a landmark development in the history of gay rights in the United States.
Additional background: “The case concerned Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which bars employment discrimination based on race, religion, national origin and sex,” Adam Liptak writes for The New York Times. “The question for the justices was whether that last prohibition — discrimination ‘because of sex’— applies to many millions of gay and transgender workers.” This decision was the Supreme Court’s first on LGBTQ rights since Justice Anthony M. Kennedy retired in 2018. Kennedy wrote majority opinions in prior gay rights decisions, but there is one important difference between then and now: those decisions were grounded in constitutional law whereas the new cases concerned statutory interpretation. Here were the arguments from both sides:
On the Right: Because this latest decision concerned statutory interpretation, the Trump administration and lawyers for the employers argued that if Congress wanted to protect gay and transgender workers it would need to pass a new law. The reasoning was that in 1964, common understanding of sex discrimination was bias against women or men and did not encompass discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. As it relates to the recent Supreme Court decision, Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Samuel Alito Jr. were the three dissenters. In a nutshell, the conservative Justices view the ruling as a departure from strict constructionist ideology, championed by Gorsuch’s predecessor Justice Antonin Scalia. In his 54-page dissent, Justice Alito wrote, “The Court’s opinion is like a pirate ship. It sails under a textualist flag, but what it actually represents is a theory of statutory interpretation that Justice Scalia excoriated — the theory that courts should ‘update’ old statues so that they better reflect the current values of society.” Ben Shapiro of The Daily Wire adds that yesterday’s ruling was, “…simply a bad, outcome-driven legal decision. And it throws religious liberty, free speech, and employment law into complete turmoil.” Lastly, Carrie Severino, president of the Judicial Crisis Network, echoed the sentiments above, tweeting that the ruling “was the hijacking of textualism. You can’t redefine the meaning of words themselves and still be doing textualism. This is an ominous sign for anyone concerned about the future of representative democracy.”
On the Left: Lawyers for the gay and transgender workers responded that discrimination against employees based on sexual orientation or transgender status must as a matter of logic take account of sex. Justice Neil Gorsuch who authored the decision, explained that, “In Title VII, Congress outlawed discrimination in the workplace on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Today, we must decide whether an employer can fire someone simply for being homosexual or transgender. The answer is clear. An employer who fires an individual for being homosexual or transgender fires that person for traits or actions it would not have questioned in members of a different sex. Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what Title VII forbids.” Those are the “5 simple sentences” that are “clear, straightforward, and correct” according to left-leaning outlet Vox. Mark Joseph Stern of Slate adds that, “It is a victory for the country because, in one fell swoop, the court granted vital protections to LGBTQ people in every state, making the United States a fairer, freer place. It is a victory for the court because the decision is an encouraging sign that the justices can still practice neutral and responsible jurisprudence without partisan influence.” Kristen Browde, co-chair of the National Trans Bar Association, said in a statement, “This decision sends an unambiguous message that equal protection under the law applies to all and that an employee’s failure to adhere to an employer’s gender stereotype is not a licence to discriminate.” Sarah Kate Ellis, the president and CEO of GLAAD, a pro-LGBTQ group, said the decision “affirms what shouldn’t have even been a debate: LGBTQ Americans should be able to work without fear of losing jobs because of who they are.”
Flag This: Even as the court has grown more conservative, yesterday’s ruling extends more than a decade of advances for gay-rights advocates at the Supreme Court. This includes the 2015 decision that legalized same-sex marriage. The AP notes the “outcome is expected to have a big impact for the estimated 8.1 million LGBTQ workers across the country,” but that “Monday’s decision is not likely to be the court’s last word on a host of issues revolving around LGBTQ rights.” For example, “Lawsuits are pending over transgender athletes’ participation in school sporting events, and courts also are dealing with cases about sex-segregated bathrooms and locker rooms.” POLITICO also notes that “LGBTQ individuals in many states still have no legal protection against other forms of discrimination, such as housing or public accommodations, although the new decision could bolster efforts to win such protection in the courts or in Congress.” Lastly, The Daily Wire points out that, “The court did not specifically address whether religious organizations, many of whom prohibit openly gay individuals from serving as employees, will receive a carve-out exception to the ruling, or whether transgender individuals who have not had gender-reassignment surgery can be considered members of the opposite sex — an issue at the forefront of women’s athletics.” Keep an eye out for these issues to come before the Supreme Court as early as next term as there are cases currently pending in lower courts on both issues.
🦅 US NEWS
Supreme Court Story Two: Gun-Rights Appeals Turned Away
“The U.S. Supreme Court turned away 10 appeals that sought to broaden constitutional firearm protections, rejecting calls for rights to own a semi-automatic assault rifle and carry a handgun in public,” Greg Stohr writes for Bloomberg.
- Flag This: “The rebuffs are a blow to the gun-rights movement, which has been trying for a decade to get the court to take up a major new Second Amendment case. They have been banking on Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who replaced the swing vote Anthony Kennedy in 2018, to make the court more assertive on the issue.” Keep reading
Supreme Court Story Three: Supreme Court declines to weigh in on legal doctrine that shields law enforcement
“The Supreme Court declined on Monday to take a closer look at a legal doctrine it created nearly 40 years ago that critics say is shielding law enforcement and government officials from accountability,” Ariane de Vogue, Jamie Ehrlich and Devan Cole write for CNN.
- Flag This: “In recent years, legal scholars, judges and justices on all sides of the ideological spectrum have criticized the legal doctrine known as ‘qualified immunity,’ arguing that it is not grounded in the proper legal authorities and it too often shields officials from accountability.” Keep reading.
🌎 WORLD NEWS
“Beijing reintroduced strict lockdown measures and rolled out mass testing after a fresh cluster of novel coronavirus cases emerged from the city’s largest wholesale food market, sparking fears of a resurgence of the deadly outbreak,” Nectar Gan reports for CNN. Details: “The cases are linked to Xinfadi market in the southwest of the city, which supplies most of the capital’s fresh fruit and vegetables. The market, which also sells meat and seafood, has been shut down since Saturday.”
- Flag This: “The sudden reemergence of the virus in Beijing, previously considered among the country’s safest cities, has raised the prospect of a second wave of infections.” The news sent Asian shares lower on Monday. Japan’s Nikkei, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng, China’s Shanghai Composite, India’s Sensex, South Korea’s Kospi, and Australia’s ASX All Ordinaries index all finished the day lower.
Russia Jails Ex-U.S. Marine for 16 Years on Spying Charges
Reuters reported on Monday that “a Russian court convicted former U.S. marine Paul Whelan of spying for the United States and sentenced him to 16 years in jail.”
- Russia says Whelan, 50, was caught with a computer flash drive containing classified information. Whelan, who pleaded not guilty, said he was set up in a sting operation and thought the drive, given to him by a Russian acquaintance, contained holiday photos.
- The U.S. says no evidence has been produced to prove Whelan’s guilt during what John Sullivan, U.S. Ambassador to Russia, called a mockery of justice. Whelan held up a piece of paper on which he denounced the proceedings as a “sham trial” and asked U.S. President Donald Trump and the leaders of Britain, Canada, and Ireland to take “decisive action”.
- Flag This: A prisoner swap may be imminent. “Moscow has called for the release of two Russians jailed in the United States. [One is] arms dealer Viktor Bout, who agreed to sell weapons to U.S. undercover agents posing as Colombian guerrillas planning to attack American soldiers, and Konstantin Yaroshenko, who was convicted of conspiracy to smuggle cocaine.”
🗞️ BIZ, SPORTS, & TECH
China Accepts Amex
American Express received approval from China’s central bank to launch a network that will process payment transactions in yuan. This makes Amex the first foreign payment processor that will be allowed to clear transactions in mainland China.
Durant Buys Stake in MLS Side Philadelphia Union
Brooklyn Nets star Kevin Durant officially joined the ranks of sports team owners on Monday with the announcement that he purchased a 5% stake in the Philadelphia Union of Major League Soccer.
Walmart Teams Up With Shopify
Lastly, Walmart announced a partnership with Shopify on Monday to capitalize on a spike in online shopping driven by the coronavirus. Walmart plans to integrate roughly 1,200 Shopify sellers into its marketplace in 2020, focusing on small- and medium-sized businesses in the US.
📢 PRESENTED BY KENNY FLOWERS
🗳️ FLAG POLLS
Results From Last Week’s Flag Poll
President Trump said he would overrule any governor who disagreed with him that places of worship should be allowed to reopen in accordance with new CDC guidelines. Do you think congregations should be allowed to reopen? 86% said Yes, 14% said No. Full results and comments.
This Week’s Flag Poll
Do you support President Trump’s Executive Order against social media companies? Click here to vote.
Do You Really Need to Walk 10,000 Steps a Day (Like, *Really*)? Is that exact number of steps absolutely necessary? What if you can only get in 5,000 steps a day Pure Wow · 6 Mins
Is It More Important to Run Faster or Run Longer? Scientists debate the physiological benefits of ramping up your training intensity or your training volume. Outside · 5 min
The Two Things Killing Your Ability to Focus: It’s not only the fact that you’re looking at a screen for half the day, but that certainly isn’t helping. Harvard Business Review · 6 Mins